Wyman Brent.
Visit me at:
  • VJPL
  • Public speaker
  • Art
  • TEFL/TESOL
  • Contact
  • News blog
  • Fotos
  • Videos
  • Articles
  • Misc Blog
  • CV
  • Webmaster

MERCANTILISM AND SLAVERY ON THE PLANTATIONS

7/15/2012

2 Comments

 
The British government and its merchants aligned to create a form of mercantilism that ensured the coffers continued to fill at a steady rate. An effort was made to ensure that the various British possessions, including the North American colonies, remained completely dependent upon trade with the homeland. According to Nettels, the British did want to achieve total self-sufficiency. This was not possible, even despite the protective tariffs put into place by the government. The tariffs and taxes imposed to keep the royals and merchants rich led to resentment among those who were under British domination. Mercantilism at its extreme was exclusionary and ultimately self-defeating for the British. 

The British did their best to create and support homegrown agriculture and industries. Citizens were encouraged to show initiative, and those who did were given benefits by the state (Nettels, 1952, p. 106). This was not act of socialism as Nettels points out. Those who showed initiative and succeeded were duly rewarded, whereas as those who risked all and failed were not propped up by the state.

The growth of colonial agricultural development and native industries led to the creation of the Navigation Acts. These acts were a trade barrier designed to funnel all trade from the colonies through British ports. Colonists were not allowed to trade directly with the other nations of Europe. The first act was created in 1651 and revised periodically in small ways. The act came about thanks to the Eighty Years’ War which ended in 1648. The British found themselves in a competition which saw a decrease in the power and profitability of trade. Thus, the requirement of the colonies to trade directly with the home country was designed to shield British merchants from a competitive war of which there was no guarantee of winning.

The colonists in the New World were supposed to remain agrarian and send to Britain produce such as tobacco and cotton. Whatever industrial development necessary was to be controlled and overseen by the British. The colonists were primarily in supporting roles, even when the British overseers were new to the shores. The local knowledge and expertise of the colonists was seen as less important to advancement than place of birth. At the same time, the British showed no aversion to exploiting the locals. The Navigation Acts were meant to ensure that the cotton, tobacco, and other colonial goods enriched the British above all.

Every law which protected British merchants came about not because of governmental innovation and policies, but rather as a response to developments which merchants (British or otherwise) were responsible for (Nettels, 1952, p. 108). According to Nettels, the colonists were given free rein in developing industries until such time as they threatened British industries and British profits. The Staple Act was pushed for by British merchants requiring colonists to buy manufactured goods and even slaves from the home country.

The colonists were subjected to the ultimate in protectionist policies. British interests came above all others. The growth of slavery in the colonies came about in large part as a method of colonists attempting to reduce expenditures. Although the slaves had to be bought from Britain, the workers then provide a source of cheap labor. Farmers were completely dependent upon the home country because of the artificial imbalance in trade. The colonists could only buy and sell to the British. Thus, conditions were set which left an indebtedness which could never be fully done away with. The Navigation Act did stimulate the growth of shipping and shipbuilding (Nettels, 1952, p. 110), but the colonists were still restricted in where those ships could sail.

The British government (thanks to the direct influence of the merchant class) did its best to restrict and manipulate colonial trade. The gross imbalance did much to lead the colonists down the path of rebellion. The infamous Stamp Act of 1765 happened to be the straw which finally broke the backs of the colonists. Trade restrictions and barriers were no longer enough to contain a people who wanted self-determination.

 

References

Berkin, C. (2011). Making America: A History. Independence, Kentucky. Wadsworth Cengage

           Learning.

Nettels, C.P. (1952, Spring). British Mercantilism and the Economic Development of the Thir

           teen Colonies. The Journal of Economic History, 12(2), 105-114. Retrieved from

           http://www.jstor.org.

2 Comments
Huston Haas
9/14/2014 09:57:51 am

Reply
Alaina Perez
9/20/2017 10:12:28 pm

The British wanted to keep control of the colonies by having them provide goods for the mother country. Britian would reward those who participated in agriculture, thus being the Elites who wanted to settle in the Chesapeake Region. The Chesapeake Region had very good soil and allowed plenty of good economic possibilities. This brought on the incredible need for slaves to plant crops and such, they were also a cheap source of labor and produced mass numbers of cash crops for Britian. The British required the colonist to pay a tax as well as other tariffs, this was sort of their plan in order for the merchants and other royals to benefit from this and become rich. However, this did not work out very well in their favor, the colonist ended up getting upset with Britian and began to sell to other countries, this became known as the "Black Market". Lastly, once slaves were introduced to our economy there was really no going back, the people saw how much they could really gain by having slaves around, soon enough the Elites also realized that they could be in support of eachother as far as "pro-slavery", this kept the large amount of profits coming in due to slavery of course.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Wyman Brent.

    Founder/initiator of the VJPL
    Public speaker
    Artist
    TEFL/TESOL teacher

    Archives

    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012

    Categories

    All
    American Revolutionary War
    Arcade
    Aristotle
    Art
    Bbc
    British
    Capitalism
    Cnn
    Doctors
    Donald Trump
    Donkey Kong
    Early Republic
    Gaming
    Groucho Marx
    Jason
    Jean Kilbourne
    John Stuart Mill
    Kant
    Karl Marx
    Medea
    Mercantilism
    Middle East
    Morals
    Moral Theories
    Mubarak
    Native Americans
    Nazi
    Nickelodeon
    Nintendo
    Pac Man
    Philosohy
    Plantations
    Playstation
    Prison
    Red Man
    Redskin
    Slavery
    Socialism
    Sociology
    Technology
    United States Of America
    Usa
    Ussr
    Video Arcade
    Xbox

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.